When we shared the Cyberpunk 2077 mod ban, some comments brought up rule 34 – but it's just one piece of the eternal debate on the ethics of modding sexual content. This is specifically true for things in entertainment that aren't inherently sexual, but any attempt to thwart possible sexualization actually gives even more power to this created rule of the internet. Rule 34 isn't an actual rule it's just a term commonly used online to reference the fact that anything – absolutely anything – can be made into pornographic material via modding, fanart, etc. What is rule 34?įirst, let's talk about the ever-present rule 34. But to understand the Great Debate Of Modding, we have to dive a bit deeper into the conversation surrounding this community. reality has always been a subject that has two clear and opposing stances. For as long as I've been covering mods in my career, the ethical debate of fiction vs. The conversation surrounding that previous coverage, and similar instances when a recognizable name is used in a game, prompted a desire to explore this topic further. Today, we covered that this very reasoning could be the nail in the Yakuza spinoff series Judgement's coffin. The reason behind the ban was because the studio felt it was inappropriate to recreate explicit sexual encounters with a real person who did not give their permission (despite the character himself having numerous scenes throughout the game that were graphically sexual in nature).

Earlier this year, CD Projekt Red banned a Cyberpunk 2077 mod that allowed players to retexturize in-game assets to virtually have sex with Keanu Reeves' character, Johnny Silverhand.

Rule 34 plotagon